| Contents: |
| 1 |
General remarks (below) |
Smiling, channeling, breathing |
| 2 |
Packing small SPC |
Slurry is packed with a syringe |
| 3 |
Packing Prep SPC |
Slurry is packed with a pump |
| 4 |
HETP Determination (below) |
Spikes and "in-process" methods |
1. General remarks:
 |
Properly packed columns:
the bed is uniform and tight throughout the entire
column volume. |
 |
Under-packed columns:
loose bed settles with time or under pressure leaving voids behind.
Uniform settling (flat bed surface detached from the frit) results in band broadening due
to the "smiling" effect.
Non-uniform settling (channels) results in early "break-through"
and severe "tailing". |
 |
Over-packed
columns: areas of compressed soft beads restrict the flow and
result in "peak tailing". Over time, the packing density equalizes
throughout the entire column. Such bed relaxation can occur by itself
and/or is assisted by pumping and other vibration. |
 |
"Breathing bed":
reversible 1-5% volume change of the bed, e.g. ion-exchanger
under the extremes of pH/salt condition. Bed contraction can produce
channeling and/or "smiling". Bed expansion can
over-pressure or even burst the
column (e.g. when a soft Q-exchanger is treated with NaOH followed by
pure H2O, ref: Donnan equilibrium). In most cases,
a proper choice
of running/cleaning conditions and a proper selection of the packing media
prevents this
problem. |
 |
Biseps,
Inc. recommends packing procedures for our SPC hardware that are generally
applicable to any sorbent slurry.
However, optimal parameters (slurry concentration, pressure, flow,
solvent, etc.) can differ from one sorbent to another.
Therefore, we suggest to consult with particular sorbent
manufacturer for specific packing protocols. |
#4.
4.1. Spikes. One way to evaluate/validate packing quality is to inject
spikes into the column at about 1-2 % of the Column Volume. Normally,
acetone (1% solution in the buffer) or a salt (NaCl, 0.1-M) is used.
4.2. In-Process Methods. These non-intrusive methods are based
on the frontal shape of the salt/pH concentration shifts during the process,
such as during elution, or washing, or cleaning steps. However, ascending
salt gradients under certain conditions might produce up to 100-X larger HETP
values than the descending one (Hans P. Lettner, Oliver kaltenbrunner, and Alois
Jungbauer, "HETP in Process Ion-Exchange Chromatography", J. Chrom.
Sci. 33 (1995)). Therefore, any "in-process" method must
be thoroughly validated under specific in-process conditions using the
spike method.
|